.
Image: File.
In a hyper-connected world, social media doesn’t clock out at 5pm. Employees move seamlessly between Slack, WhatsApp, X and Instagram, often blurring the line between personal opinion and professional identity.
For South African employers, that blur is no longer just a cultural issue; it’s a legal and reputational risk.
From a disgruntled post that goes viral to an innocent photo that exposes confidential information, unmanaged social media use has the potential to cause serious damage. And yet, many organisations still operate without a clear social media policy, leaving themselves exposed when things go wrong.
As digital behaviour increasingly intersects with the workplace, Robyn Shepherd, an attorney (Labour Law) at SchoemanLaw Inc, warns that having a legally sound social media policy is no longer optional; it’s essential.
The dangers of unchecked social media use extend far beyond embarrassment.
Employers face growing exposure to reputational harm, data breaches, workplace harassment, and even discrimination claims arising from online conduct, according to Shepherd.
Productivity also takes a hit when social platforms creep into working hours without limits.
Crucially, without a written policy, employers may struggle to discipline employees fairly.
Under South African labour law, inconsistency or vague expectations can render disciplinary action unlawful, even when the misconduct seems obvious, she added.
According to Shepherd, South Africa doesn’t have a single law dedicated to workplace social media use, but several legal frameworks come into play.
The Constitution protects employees’ rights to privacy, dignity and freedom of expression.
However, these rights are not absolute.
Shepherd noted that they may be limited when weighed against an employer’s legitimate interests, including protecting its reputation, safeguarding clients, and maintaining trust in the employment relationship.
The Labour Relations Act (LRA) adds another layer.
For any dismissal linked to online misconduct to stand, employers must show that a clear rule existed, that the employee knew about it, and that discipline was applied fairly and consistently. In practice, that means a written policy matters, she added.
Then there’s POPIA. Employees who share customer details, internal communications or sensitive company information online, even unintentionally, may expose their employer to serious compliance breaches and penalties.
According to Shepherd, a strong policy isn’t about controlling employees’ private lives. It’s about setting boundaries in a digital environment where personal and professional identities often overlap.
At minimum, a policy should clarify when it applies, during work hours, outside of work, or whenever employees reference the company, colleagues or clients. It should spell out acceptable use, including whether social media access is permitted during the workday.
Equally important is defining prohibited conduct. This typically includes sharing confidential information, making defamatory or discriminatory remarks, harassing colleagues online, impersonating the business, or bringing the company into disrepute.
Employees should also understand the consequences. Clear links to the organisation’s disciplinary code, from warnings to dismissal, help avoid disputes later.
Monitoring and privacy deserve careful handling. If work devices or systems are monitored, employees must be informed, and monitoring must be proportionate and lawful. Policies should also address brand protection, outlining when logos, images or internal content may be used.
Finally, policies should encourage responsible reporting of abuse or misuse, while making it clear that legitimate whistleblowing will be protected.
In an era where a single post can undo years of brand-building, a social media policy is one of the most cost-effective risk management tools available to employers.
It creates certainty for management, guidance for employees, and a shared understanding of what responsible online conduct looks like.
FAST COMPANY (SA)